Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: The current methods for pre‑ and post‑chemotherapy examination of the extent of disease in the breast and lymph nodes do not provide sufficiently accurate information and, not infrequently, the surgeon has to re‑operate.

Objectives: To correlate the findings between three methods of examination (physical examination, ultrasonography, mammography), all performed by the same oncologic and radiologic team, in patients with locally advanced breast cancer or a tumor/breast tissue ratio that precludes breast-conserving surgery.

Methods: Forty patients (median age 48 years, range 24–73) with locally advanced breast cancer or with a tumor/breast ratio that precluded breast‑conserving surgery were evaluated by the same medical team and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surgery was performed in all, and the pathologic specimen was correlated with the results of the other examinations.

Results: In the pre‑chemotherapy evaluation, the imaging findings of the breast correlated with the physical findings in 78% of the patients and with the axilla examination in 66.7%. In the post‑chemotherapy analysis, imaging agreed with the physical findings of the breast in 62.2% and in 76.3% of the axilla. Sonography best detected occult breast disease and axillary lymph nodes but correlated with pathology in only 58% of the patients in diagnosing breast tumor and in 65.8% in diagnosing axillary lymph nodes. Mammography correlated with breast and lymph node pathology in half the patients.

Conclusions: None of the classical methods of post‑neoadjuvant chemotherapy evaluations could adequately delineate the actual extent of the disease in the breast and axillary lymph nodes. More exacting techniques of imaging combined with the classical methods are required.

Background: Hyperthermia combined with radiation therapy was shown to be more effective in local recurrent breast cancer than radiotherapy alone, but it use is limited due to technical difficulties, stringent reimbursement policies and because it is time consuming.

Objectives: To report our experience with a simple and convenient XRT+HT[1] delivery system.

Methods: XRT was delivered through either electron or photon beams (total dose 30–40 Gy in previously irradiated fields or 50–70 Gy in non-irradiated fields). Hyperthermia was delivered by a dedicated HT device operating at 915 MHz. The heating session lasted 45 minutes. The maximal tumor surface temperature was set at 45°C and modified according to patient comfort. No intratumoral (invasive) thermometry was used. At least two HT sessions were scheduled to each HT field during the entire XRT treatment period. Tumor response was evaluated every 3 months after completion of treatment. The overall survival was measured from XRT+HT initiation until the last follow‑up.

Results: Fifteen women underwent 114 HT treatments delivered through 28 HT fields. Twenty-four HT fields (15 patients) were previously irradiated. There was complete infield response in 10 fields (6 patients), partial response in 8 fields (4 patients), no response or progressive disease in 4 fields (3 patients), and no parameters in 6 fields (5 patients). Eighteen (64%) fields had complete or partial response. Seven patients had outfield recurrence despite wide XRT+HT fields. Ulceration was the only major side effect (three patients, three fields).

Conclusions: The combined HT+XRT delivery system, with no invasive thermometry, is a simple and effective method for treating local recurrent breast cancer.

Background: Several in vitro studies have reported on the efficacy of combined liposomal encapsulated doxorubicin (Doxil® or Caelyx®, MedEquip, UK) and hyperthermia over Doxil alone.

Objectives: To document the beneficial effect of Doxil-HT over Doxil alone in mice and to investigate the length of time HT[1] should be delivered.

Methods: M/109 lung tumor cells were injected into both leg pads of Balb/c female mice at age of 6–7 weeks. Two weeks later i.v. Doxil in a dose of 8 mg/kg (20–25 µg per mouse) was given and 4 HT sessions (2–3 days apart) were delivered during the subsequent 2 weeks at 2–3 days apart. HT was given to the left pad only for either 5 or 30 minutes (HT5 and HT30 respectively). Five weeks after tumor injection the mice were sacrificed and tumor volume and weight in both pads were measured. Internal comparisons between mice in the same treatment group and comparisons between different treatment cohorts were performed.

Results: In the combined Doxil-HT5 and Doxil-HT30 cohorts the tumor volume and weight in both pads were similar and did not differ from those achieved by Doxil alone. In the Doxil-HT30 cohort the tumor weight, but not the tumor volume, were smaller than those in Doxil-HT5 and Doxil alone (P = 0.006 and 0.01 respectively).

Conclusions: The combined Doxil-HT30 treatment is more effective then Doxil-HT5 or Doxil alone. Additional studies with different time scheduling and different temperatures are warranted.

__________________________

[1] HT = hyperthermia